What is a better defragment program: OO defrag or Diskeeper?
January 26th, 2020
Diskeeper of course.
So why there is 6 pages of download O O defrag, and diskeeper only 2 ?
diskeeper FTW!!!! no more arguments about this for god sake
Sorry mods about the double post. My wifi connection actually dropped So why there is 6 pages of download O O defrag, and diskeeper only 2 ?
thats because sick horny n00bs get attracted by the ‘O O’
jus jokin……
i donno actually why but diskeeper is much better
So why in diskeeper I can’t defrag low-performing system files ?
with low-performing system files, you mean the ‘pink’ files right?
with low-performing system files, you mean the 'pink' files right?
Yes
i’ve using OO defrag for few months. did the job for me.
JkDefrag by far. (GNU plus)
with low-performing system files, you mean the 'pink' files right?
Yes
gimme some time. i know the solution for this i guess. I’ll help you through PM regarding this.
I’m waiting.
…and sites downloading slowly. I’m listening the internet files cache came from hard drive slowly too.
I use PerfectDisk ………. I tried Diskeeper (good) and O&O but decided PerfectDisk was best for my PC.
I prefer Perfect Disk….
I tryed all the different defrag programs out there, and Perfect Disk is in my opinion the best….
I use Perfect Disk right now. I had used diskeeper and O&O before. Diskeeper is quite effective. O&O is very slow.
PerfectDisk look like O&O.
Diskeeper look like Disk Defragmenter – they look more professional.
I use Perfect Disk right now. I had used diskeeper and O&O before. Diskeeper is quite effective. O&O is very slow.So why you stopped using Diskeeper ?
Please don't double post. Use the Edit option when you want to add something. Also read the rules about bumping. Thank you. ~Chronus~
alex8 wrote: Select all
I use Perfect Disk right now. I had used diskeeper and O&O before. Diskeeper is quite effective. O&O is very slow.
So why you stopped using Diskeeper ?
I don’t got the working crack at that time (before I join w-bb) so i change to O&O, After one of my Hard Drive died. I change to Perfect Disk.
Diskeeper is similar to Perfect Disk. But it’s hard to say which is better.
Answer #18
PerfectDIsk and O&O look like old defragment programs.
Answer #19
PerfectDIsk and O&O look like old defragment programs.
Diskeeper is good and defragment fast.
Answer #20
alex8 wrote:
Diskeeper is similar to Perfect Disk. But it's hard to say which is better.
I agree with you mate ……… it’s a matter of choice.
Both can be set to manual defragmenting or automatic at a certain day/time and both can do Boot-time defragmentation of system files.
I have nothing against Diskeeper which is a well established defragmenter but I just prefer the look and feel of PerfectDisk ………. personal choice really …….. both do the job equally well.
Answer #21
alex8 wrote: Select all
PerfectDIsk and O&O look like old defragment programs.
Diskeeper is good and defragment fast.
Do you use automatic defragmentation ?
Answer #22
uh.. Windows default defrag program? you don’t really need any special software for better results as far as i know. never used any because i never had to, but according to what many say i’ve been hearing that PerfectDisk is quite good.
Answer #23
Is diskeeper support windows 98 ? And if not, what defragment programs support ?
Answer #24
In diskeeper 2008, if I turn off windows firewall, is it effective ?
Answer #25
Its all in your heads people, all they have is just a fancy GUI on top of M$ defragger. But i heard stories of how people who actually buy that program Diskeeper and then it replaced M$ one and it wouldnt defrag well mess up their whole OS and they didnt get refund. Seen several of those on google, who knows man. But i tell ya what, the one that comes with windows is the best!! dont change it or u risk causing issues you didnt have before!
Answer #26
I am using O&O Defrag currently. It’s quite a good defrag tool in my opinion. It’s clean, simple, and relatively light on resources. It does the job. I tried DK 2008 sometime ago, and my feeling was that it’s quite fancy and heavy on resources. So I prefer O&O. Well, it all depends on personal preferences.
When you defrag the thing that causes some nuisance, is that O&O Defrag needs to connect back [i.e. loopback] to the computer through net protocol. So the firewall will ask for the permission of such loopback.
I believe what happens in DiskKeeper is quite the same though.
Answer #27
lmao, I’ve always used windows defrag till I got ultimate defrag does the job quick and looks tight in a spiral
Answer #28
Is this what make my hard drive jump in 1 second ?
Answer #29
I prefer PerfectDisk. I use ti for about 2years. I dunno why they copied skin in the lattest ver almost the same as O&O…
Answer #30
Diskeeper has Invisitasking and IFaast. No other defragmentation software has anything that comes even close to either of those. For most it is a simple scheduling system for the equivalent of a manual defrag running at a lower priority.
Answer #31
Thanks
Answer #32
i use Diskeeper
however i can’t give a valid response as i have only used this
although the person who recommended this to me said it was better and i trust him
Answer #33
for vista users, consider this
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/the_disk_defrag_difference
Answer #34
I use O&O Defragment. Good program. you can defragment using screen saver. Very Good.
Answer #35
Seriously….Diskeeper of course!
Answer #36
Epic bump, anyway Diskeeper 2010’s Intelliwrite does pretty much what ext3 etc. do so you’d be mad not to have it.
Answer #37
This thread helped me, I was having trouble deciding which to use. Not anymore
Answer #38
Well, good for you. I have trouble yet again. I was long time Diskeeper v8 user, however recently it say it cannot defrag bigger that 512MB HDDs. So I need to replace it with version that does support that…
Also I have no idea what to use to degragment a WinNT partition, preferably by booting from a CD on old Pentium 90MHz system. So, suggestions are welcome
It is against the rules to make a reply to an old topic unless under special circumstances such as, but not limited to, the topic's discussion has died but there is new striking evidence to turn thoughts around or saying thank you for the author. A reply with information that is relevant and useful is allowed.. -
| Sitemap |