Please tell me the name of best .nfo file reader

April 24th, 2014

Hello all
I am looking for best .nfo file reader. Please tell me the name of software if you know.
Regards

Answer #1
I’m using notepad…
Answer #2
I use Rainbow
http://www.rainbow-software.org/programs.html
Answer #3
notepad is not best for me :p
Answer #4
Damn NFO Viewer:
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Office-tools/Text-editors/DAMN-NFO-Viewer.shtml
Answer #5
Damn Nfo viewer..
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Office-tools/Text-editors/DAMN-NFO-Viewer.shtml
Answer #6
I do not know any software i always open .nfo with notepad, try this:
http://damn-nfo-viewer.en.softonic.com/
Answer #7
Thank you guys “Damn” is looks like best software for this.
Answer #8
Notepad
Answer #9
Notepad++
http://notepad-plus-plus.org/
Answer #10
Another vote for Damn NFO Viewer.
Answer #11
notepad…
why bother with another new piece of junk software on your computer cluttering stuff up, when you have the perfect program already on your pc?
Answer #12
I use notepad++ its great
Answer #13
GetDiz is another popular freeware program.
http://www.outertech.com/en/notepad-replacement
Answer #14
I used to use GetDiz, but to be quite honest all you need is Notepad …. just associate .nfo files with Notepad and when you click on one it will automatically open with Notepad.
Answer #15
Saturnsid replied: ... but to be quite honest all you need is Notepad
This is true, but in order to display the ASCII art correctly you need a nfo viewer.
It currently not so much of a big deal but back in the day it was a key concept in relation to cracking groups.
Answer #16
Notepad is king.
Answer #17
wwsmithe replied: Saturnsid replied: ... but to be quite honest all you need is Notepad
This is true, but in order to display the ASCII art correctly you need a nfo viewer.
It currently not so much of a big deal but back in the day it was a key concept in relation to cracking groups.

Yes, that’s why I use GetDiz myself because it’s far better than Notepad++ for nfo’s. GetDiz allows editing which Damn doesn’t.
It’s a pity the programmer doesn’t make the image snapshot work better and make a full image rather than only the displayed portion, if it did, it would be close to perfect.

 

| Sitemap |